When blockages keep coming back
The line has blocked more than once, with normal use in between.
The single most useful thing you can do about a recurring blockage costs nothing: write down the dates. A shortening interval is information no camera can recover later.
What this page cannot establish
- noticing this establishes that you noticed it — it does not establish a cause
- this page cannot establish that recurrence proves structural damage
- this page cannot establish that recurrence proves root intrusion
- this page cannot establish that the line requires replacement rather than maintenance
- this page cannot establish the location of whatever is causing the recurrence
What a professional will be trying to work out
These are the distinctions a professional makes when they attend. They are questions, not conclusions — and knowing them lets you follow the conversation rather than just receive its result.
- the interval between events and whether it is shortening
- whether the same fixtures are involved each time
- what was done at each clearing and whether the method differed
- whether the line has ever been inspected between events rather than only cleared
What is worth writing down
These details are cheap to record now and impossible to reconstruct later.
- the date of each event you can recall or document
- which fixtures were affected each time
- what method was used to clear it, if you were told
- whether the interval between events is getting shorter
Evidence that would change the next decision
If you are deciding whether something is worth paying for, these are the things that actually move the decision.
- dates of each event, which is often the most useful single record
- invoices showing what was done each time
- a camera inspection performed after a clearing rather than before
- whether anything was recovered or observed during clearing
What would change the answer
- dates of each event, which is often the most useful single record
- invoices showing what was done each time
- a camera inspection performed after a clearing rather than before
- whether anything was recovered or observed during clearing
What to do next
Recurrence is the classic case where an inspection performed *after* a clearing, rather than before, is what changes the decision.
Understand what an inspection after clearing would showIf your situation is different
- You have been told it is roots: When a professional says roots
- You are being quoted for replacement: Repair or replace: the questions that matter
Related, and why
- Limits of cleaning
Repeated clearing produces very little information unless someone looks.
- Project brief
The dates and invoices from each event are exactly what a brief is for.